Forum Home »
Pitfalls of letting a flat without telling mortgage company
|
|
| Pitfalls of letting a flat without telling mortgage company |
Posted: Jan 19 07 17:39
Total Posts: 41
Users Rating:
|
Just on the forum and spotted your question, so answering ... David may well give more info too in due course. The short answer is probably yes, since additional insurance is often a mandatory requirement of acquiring the headlessor's permission to let. Even if they don't demand it, specialised landlord insurance for buildings (which is much more comprehensive than ordinary or block building insurance) is advisable and will usually cover you for typical let-property expenses, in the event of disaster.
Average Rating: unrated
Tags:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Jan 19 07 20:42
Total Posts: 96
Users Rating:
|
Anthony,
You need to ask for a copy of the policy. I have 3 leashold buy to lets, for 2 of these the insurance cover is very good with no provisos about letting the flat. The third limits compensation for having to move out of the flat while repairs take place to £3000. I decided to accept the risk but others may prefer take out a landlord policy to top this up.
Regards
Alan
Average Rating: unrated
Tags:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Jan 20 07 11:47
Total Posts: 2
Users Rating: unrated
|
Sorry for not replying earlier.
I would agree with what Alan and Tony have already said.
For the four flats I own the block buildings insurance is v.comprehensive and about as good as any specialist landlord policy.
But it is worth checking though.
Good luck
David Lawrenson
Average Rating: unrated
Tags:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Back to forum
Property Secrets supports
Call Property Secrets on: +44 (0)1270 539550